Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360262›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Introducing Copula as a Novel Statistical Method in Psychological Analysis.

Elham Dehghani, Somayeh Hadad Ranjbar, Moharram Atashafrooz, Hossein Negarestani, Amir Mosavi, Levente Kovacs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elham DehghaniDepartment of Psychology, Rafsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan 7718184483, Iran.
Somayeh Hadad RanjbarDepartment of Theology and General Islamic Courses, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan 7718897111, Iran.
Moharram AtashafroozImam Khomeini Specialized Center, Islamic Counseling Faculty, Qom 3713755518, Iran.
Hossein NegarestaniDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan 7718897111, Iran.
Amir MosaviJohn von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-0613
Levente KovacsBiomatics Institute, John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-0800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past decades, the relationship between various psychological parameters had been studied in detail. However, the dependency structure of correlated parameters was rarely investigated. Knowing the dependence structure helps in finding the probability matrix of the interaction between the parameters. In this research, a novel approach was introduced in psychological analysis using copula functions. For this purpose, the self-esteem and anxiety of 141 university students in Iran were extracted using the Coopersmith Self-esteem Inventory and the Zang Anxiety Scale. Then the dependence structure of self-esteem and anxiety were established using copula functions. The Frank copula achieved the best fit for the joint variables of self-esteem and anxiety. Finally, the probability matrix of different classes of anxiety, taking into account self-esteem classes, was extracted. The results indicated that poor self-esteem leads to severe or very severe anxiety, with more than 98% probability, while strong self-esteem may lead to normal and mild anxiety, with about 80% probability. It can be concluded that the method was promising, and that copula functions can open a window to the dependence structure analysis of psychological parameters.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersSelf ConceptAnxietyHumansPersonality DisordersPsychotherapyanxietycopuladependence structuremathematical modelingprobability matrixprobability theorypsychologyself-esteemsocial science datastatistics

Identifiers

PMID34360262
PMCPMC8345746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.