Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360169›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Minimum Detectable Change of Visual Acuity Measurements Using ETDRS Charts (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study).

María Carmen Sánchez-González, Raquel García-Oliver, José-María Sánchez-González, María-José Bautista-Llamas, José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano, Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Validation and evaluation of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with a new digital device: OPTOTAB®.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María Carmen Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-8615
Raquel García-OliverDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.
José-María Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-7717
María-José Bautista-LlamasDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8317-5014
José-Jesús Jiménez-RejanoPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3358-3305
Concepción De-Hita-CantalejoDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our work, we determined the value of visual acuity (VA) with ETDRS charts (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study). The purpose of the study was to determine the measurement reliabilities, calculating the correlation coefficient interclass (ICC), the value of the error associated with the measure (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC). Forty healthy subjects took part. The mean age was 23.5 ± 3.1 (19 to 26) years. Visual acuities were measured with ETDRS charts (96% ETDRS chart nº 2140) and (10% SLOAN Contrast Eye Test chart nº 2153). The measurements were made (at 4 m) under four conditions: Firstly, photopic conditions with high contrast (HC) and low contrast (LC) and after 15 min of visual rest, mesopic conditions with high and low contrast. Under photopic conditions and high contrast, the ICC = 0.866 and decreased to 0.580 when the luminosity and contrast decreased. The % MDC in the four conditions was always less than 10%. It was minor under photopic conditions and HC (5.83) and maximum in mesopic conditions and LC (9.70). Our results conclude a high reliability of the ETDRS test, which is higher in photopic and high contrast conditions and lower when the luminosity and contrast decreases.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyAdultHealthy VolunteersHumansReproducibility of ResultsVision TestsVisual AcuityYoung AdultETDRSminimal detectable changevisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID34360169
PMCPMC8345763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.