Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360139›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Conspiracy Theories, Psychological Distress, and Sympathy for Violent Radicalization in Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Anna Levinsson, Diana Miconi, Zhiyin Li, Rochelle L Frounfelker, Cécile Rousseau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna LevinssonDivision of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada.
Diana MiconiDivision of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada.
Zhiyin LiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave. W, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada.
Rochelle L FrounfelkerDivision of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7382-3030
Cécile RousseauDivision of Social and Cultural Psychiatry, McGill University, CLSC Parc-Extension, 7085 Hutchison, Montréal, QC H3N 1Y9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-6774
McGill University · CA

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 2017-SE-196373RAPS (Équipe de Recherche et Action sur les Polarisations Sociales) 180645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread uncertainty, promoted psychological distress, and fueled interpersonal conflict. The concomitant upsurge in endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories is worrisome because they are associated with both non-adherence to public health guidelines and intention to commit violence. This study investigates associations between endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories, support for violent radicalization (VR) and psychological distress among young adults in Canada. We hypothesized that (a) endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories is positively associated with support for VR, and (b) psychological distress modifies the relationship between COVID-19 conspiracy theories and support for VR. A total of 6003 participants aged 18-35 years old residing in four major Canadian cities completed an online survey between 16 October 2020 and 17 November 2020, that included questions about endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories, support for VR, psychological distress, and socio-economic status. Endorsement of conspiracy theories was associated with support for VR in multivariate regression (β = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.96). There is a significant interaction effect between endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and psychological distress (β = 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.57). The magnitude of the association was stronger in individuals reporting high psychological distress (β = 1.36, 95% CI 1.26-1.46) compared to those reporting low psychological distress (β = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.59). The association between endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and VR represents a public health challenge requiring immediate attention. The interaction with psychological distress suggests that policy efforts should combine communication and psychological strategies to mitigate the legitimation of violence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressAdolescentAdultCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPsychological TheorySARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 conspiracy theoriespsychological distressviolent radicalization

Identifiers

PMID34360139
PMCPMC8345664
OpenAlexW3184483441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.