Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360138›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Perspectives and Attitudes of Patients with COVID-19 toward a Telerehabilitation Programme: A Qualitative Study.

Carlos Bernal-Utrera, Ernesto Anarte-Lazo, Elena De-La-Barrera-Aranda, Laura Fernandez-Bueno, Manuel Saavedra-Hernandez, Juan Jose Gonzalez-Gerez, Maria Angeles Serrera-Figallo, Cleofas Rodriguez-Blanco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perceptions and Experiences of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for People With Post-Acute COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Bernal-UtreraFisiosur I + D Research Institute, Garrucha, 04630 Almería, Spain.
Ernesto Anarte-LazoDoctoral Program in Health Sciences, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9731-9039
Elena De-La-Barrera-ArandaFisiosur I + D Research Institute, Garrucha, 04630 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4805-7527
Laura Fernandez-BuenoUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3900-7088
Manuel Saavedra-HernandezFisiosur I + D Research Institute, Garrucha, 04630 Almería, Spain.
Juan Jose Gonzalez-GerezFisiosur I + D Research Institute, Garrucha, 04630 Almería, Spain.
Maria Angeles Serrera-FigalloStomatology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Cleofas Rodriguez-BlancoFisiosur I + D Research Institute, Garrucha, 04630 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8674-9180
University of Almería · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The total isolation of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires non-face-to-face medical assistance. There is evidence of the efficacy of home treatments with exercises in patients with respiratory disorders which could become the therapeutic method of choice for the treatment and supervision of patients isolated due to infection during home confinement. This study's objective was to analyse the experience and opinions of isolated patients with COVID-19 included in a programme of telerehabilitation exercises for 14 days and it is intended to reflect, from a qualitative point of view, the viability and usefulness of telerehabilitation tools in the management of these patients. Twenty-five participants of a telerehabilitation programme were interviewed by telephone through semi-structured interviews, following a positivist and objective model. The data were categorised and analysed through NVIVO qualitative analysis software. The information obtained was classified into four main topics (telerehabilitation programme, perception of clinical benefit, psychological aspects and level of health care) and six subtopics (technical aspects, communication, improvement aspects, exercise plan, motivation and applicability to public health systems). The telerehabilitation programme established in patients confined by COVID-19 is very well received, without considerable technical difficulties and generates physical and psychological improvements. Patients highlight the importance of applying this type of programme in public health systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelerehabilitationAttitudeHumansMotivationSARS-CoV-2COVID-19exercise therapyphysiotherapyqualitative analysistelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34360138
PMCPMC8345417
OpenAlexW3184275395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.