Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360093›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The WOMEN-UP Solution, a Patient-Centered Innovative e-Health Tool for Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Qualitative and Usability Study during Early-Stage Development.

Sònia Anglès-Acedo, Lorena López-Frías, Vicenç Soler, Joan Francesc Alonso, Arnoud W Kastelein, Boris C de Graaf, Eva V Vodegel, Jaana Tervo, Adriana Baban, Montserrat Espuña-Pons and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Virtual medicine in urology: Is it here to stay?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sònia Anglès-AcedoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-3759
Lorena López-FríasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Vicenç SolerDepartment of Microelectronics and Electronic Systems, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Joan Francesc AlonsoDepartment of Automatic Control, Biomedical Engineering Research Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-6716
Arnoud W KasteleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4167-1663
Boris C de GraafDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva V VodegelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6897-9495
Jaana TervoDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland.
Adriana BabanDepartment of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Montserrat Espuña-PonsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
On Behalf Of The Women-Up Consortium
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESBabeș-Bolyai University · ROKuopio University Hospital · FIUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

e-Health may enhance self-management of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI). It is crucial to involve patients in planning, developing and monitoring the optimal e-Health solution. This research aims to describe patient-centered innovation in an early developmental stage of the WOMEN-UP solution. We conducted a qualitative study through a self-developed questionnaire in 22 women with SUI, to define system requirements from a patient's perspective. The first prototype of the WOMEN-UP solution was developed. It was tested by 9 patients in a usability study (think-aloud protocol and retrospective interviews). Patient preferences regarding the possible use of an e-Health solution with serious games for PFMT were: (1) to receive feedback about PFMT; (2) convenient home-use; (3) increasing motivation; (4) available in medical centers. Identified usability aids (31) reassured our design-development plan, which considered the biofeedback and serious games as key factors. Patient's perspective detected some unexpected issues related to the calibration and serious games, involving a change in the ongoing development to get an improved WOMEN-UP solution; the value of patient-centered innovation during the development of an e-Health solution for PFMT (WOMEN-UP solution). To identify patients' unmet needs, we proposed a longitudinal approach for the future eHealth-related patient-centered innovations.

Indexed as

TelemedicineUrinary Incontinence, StressExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPatient-Centered CarePelvic FloorRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomebiofeedbackeHealthpatient-centered innovationpelvic floor muscle trainingqualitative studyserious gamesurinary incontinenceusability study

Identifiers

PMID34360093
PMCPMC8345479
OpenAlexW3186812175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.