Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360018›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Bibliometric Analysis on Nonpoint Source Pollution: Current Status, Development, and Future.

Ping Lei, Ram Kumar Shrestha, Bing Zhu, Suju Han, Hongbin Yang, Shaojun Tan, Jiupai Ni, Deti Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ping LeiCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-8392
Ram Kumar ShresthaCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Bing ZhuSchool of Urban and Rural Planing and Constrution, Mianyang Teachers' College, Mianyang 621000, China.
Suju HanSchool of Urban and Rural Planing and Constrution, Mianyang Teachers' College, Mianyang 621000, China.
Hongbin YangCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Shaojun TanCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Jiupai NiCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Deti XieCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonpoint source pollution (NPS) has become the leading factor of global water quality problems, attracting great attention from governments and researchers in various countries. Based on this situation, understanding the current research status of NPS can help guide future research. However, most of the current reviews only describe the research status of some specific aspects but fail to quantify the research hotspots and development trends on the whole, which limits the overall understanding of NPS. In this paper, bibliometrics was used to study the current status, hotspots, and frontiers of NPS research during 1991-2015, and the future research development was predicted. Over the past 15 years, there has been a remarkable growth trend in publication output, and the participation of countries/territories has also increased.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsNon-Point Source PollutionBibliometricsEuropeForecastingEnvironmental Pollutantsbibliometric analysisgeographic distributionkeyword analysisnonpoint source pollution

Identifiers

PMID34360018
PMCPMC8345492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.