Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359855›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Prognostic Relevance of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Luminal Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

Antonino Grassadonia, Vincenzo Graziano, Laura Iezzi, Patrizia Vici, Maddalena Barba, Laura Pizzuti, Giuseppe Cicero, Eriseld Krasniqi, Marco Mazzotta, Daniele Marinelli and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Lack of Immune Resilience Negatively Affects Physical Resilience: Results From the InCHIANTI Follow-Up Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Antonino GrassadoniaCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, G. D'Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Vincenzo GrazianoCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7656-824X
Laura IezziCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, G. D'Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Patrizia ViciDivision of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Maddalena BarbaDivision of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Laura PizzutiDivision of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe CiceroDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Eriseld KrasniqiDivision of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Marco MazzottaDivision of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Daniele MarinelliOncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Antonella AmodioDivision of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Clara NatoliCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, G. D'Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Nicola TinariCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a promising predictive and prognostic factor in breast cancer. We investigated its ability to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with luminal A- or luminal B-HER2-negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Pre-treatment complete blood cell counts from 168 consecutive patients with luminal breast cancer were evaluated to assess NLR. The study population was stratified into NLR

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenLymphocytesMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeKi-67 Antigenluminal breast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyneutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)predictive/prognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34359855
PMCPMC8303552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.