Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359797›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Soluble SIGLEC5: A New Prognosis Marker in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Karla Montalbán-Hernández, Ramón Cantero-Cid, Roberto Lozano-Rodríguez, Alejandro Pascual-Iglesias, José Avendaño-Ortiz, José Carlos Casalvilla-Dueñas, Gloria Cristina Bonel Pérez, Jenny Guevara, Cristóbal Marcano, Cristina Barragán and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Siglec expression in sentinel lymph nodes in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karla Montalbán-HernándezThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Ramón Cantero-CidThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Roberto Lozano-RodríguezThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0093-9707
Alejandro Pascual-IglesiasThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2214-5441
José Avendaño-OrtizThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-1821
José Carlos Casalvilla-DueñasThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Gloria Cristina Bonel PérezThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6546-3039
Jenny GuevaraThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Cristóbal MarcanoThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina BarragánThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Jaime ValentínThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Del FresnoThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1771-7254
Luis Augusto AguirreThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-9385
Eduardo López CollazoThe Innate Immune Response Group, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most deadly and third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. There is significant heterogeneity among patients with CRC, which hinders the search for a standard approach for the detection of this disease. Therefore, the identification of robust prognostic markers for patients with CRC represents an urgent clinical need. In search of such biomarkers, a total of 114 patients with colorectal cancer and 67 healthy participants were studied. Soluble SIGLEC5 (sSIGLEC5) levels were higher in plasma from patients with CRC compared with healthy volunteers. Additionally, sSIGLEC5 levels were higher in exitus than in survivors, and the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed sSIGLEC5 to be an exitus predictor (area under the curve 0.853; cut-off > 412.6 ng/mL) in these patients. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with high levels of sSIGLEC5 had significantly shorter overall survival (hazard ratio 15.68; 95% CI 4.571-53.81;

Indexed as

colorectal cancerpredictiveprognosissSIGLEC5survival

Identifiers

PMID34359797
PMCPMC8345516
OpenAlexW3190253279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.