Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359784›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Streamlined Schemes for Dosimetry of

Jens Kurth, Martin Heuschkel, Alexander Tonn, Anna Schildt, Oliver W Hakenberg, Bernd J Krause, Sarah M Schwarzenböck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Dosimetry-Driven Personalization of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Evidence and Opportunities.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Outcome-driven dosimetry optimization for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact of the Reference Multiple-Time-Point Dosimetry Protocol on the Validity of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Toward Single-Time-Point Image-Based Dosimetry ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Biodistribution and dosimetry for combined [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jens KurthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-4513
Martin HeuschkelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Alexander TonnDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Anna SchildtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Oliver W HakenbergDepartment of Urology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Bernd J KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Sarah M SchwarzenböckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(Background) Aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate in mCRPC patients treated with [

Indexed as

dosimetryprostate cancerPSMAsingle time-pointtherapy

Identifiers

PMID34359784
PMCPMC8345627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.