Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359728›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

A Novel Predictive Tool for Discriminating Endometriosis Associated Ovarian Cancer from Ovarian Endometrioma: The R2 Predictive Index.

Naoki Kawahara, Ryuta Miyake, Shoichiro Yamanaka, Hiroshi Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naoki KawaharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-2481
Ryuta MiyakeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.
Shoichiro YamanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.
Hiroshi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K09809Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K09604Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K16819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry provides a noninvasive tool to discriminate between ovarian endometrioma (OE) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC), with a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 94%, respectively. MRI models that can measure R2 values are limited, and the R2 values differ between MRI models. This study aims to extract the factors contributing to the R2 value, and to make a formula for estimating the R2 values, and to assess whether the R2 predictive index calculated by the formula could discriminate EAOC from OE.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at our institution from November 2012 to February 2019. A total of 247 patients were included in this study. Patients with benign ovarian tumors mainly received laparoscopic surgery, and the patients suspected of having malignant tumors underwent laparotomy. Information from a chart review of the patients' medical records was collected.

resultsIn the investigative cohort, among potential factors correlated with the R2 value, multiple regression analyses revealed that tumor diameter and CEA could predict the R2 value. In the validation cohort, multivariate analysis confirmed that age, CRP, and the R2 predictive index were the independent factors.

conclusionsThe R2 predictive index is useful and valuable to the detection of the malignant transformation of endometrioma.

Indexed as

CEAendometriosis associated ovarian cancermagnetic resonance imagingMR relaxometryovarian endometriomaR2 predictive index

Identifiers

PMID34359728
PMCPMC8345171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.