ArticleCancers2021
Targeting Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Functional Components in M1 Gliomas Enhances Safe Resection and Reveals M1 Plasticity Potentials.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06381726 (Personalized Rendering of Motor System Functional Plasticity Potential to Improve Glioma Resection and Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Rendering of Motor System Functional Plasticity Potential to Improve Glioma Resection and Quality of Life
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromotor modules revealed by direct electrical stimulation of the human primary motor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Intraoperative technological advances and new frontiers in precision glioma surgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Is Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Capable of Detecting Different Motor Cell Clusters Within the Precentral Gyrus Using a Single Pulse Protocol?Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- White matter connections within the central sulcus subserving the somato-cognitive action network.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- From non-human to human primates: a translational approach to enhancing resection, safety, and indications in glioma surgery while preserving sensorimotor abilities.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Review
- Facilitating complete resection of intrinsic motor cortex glioma with titration of high-frequency cortico-subcortical mapping train count informed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- The parietal architecture binding cognition to sensorimotor integration: a multimodal causal study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- The digital twin in neuroscience: from theory to tailored therapy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- The surgical management of diffuse gliomas: Current state of neurosurgical management and future directions.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Beyond Avoiding Hemiplegia after Glioma Surgery: The Need to Map Complex Movement in Awake Patient to Preserve Conation.Cancers · 2023Review
- Surgical Treatment of Glioblastoma: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Transcranial versus direct electrical stimulation for intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring: Prognostic value comparison in asleep brain tumor surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Primary-Motor-Cortex (M1) hosts two functional components, at its posterior and anterior borders, being the first faster and more excitable. We developed a mapping-technique for M1 components identification and determined their functional cortical-subcortical architecture in M1 gliomas and the impact of their identification on tumor resection and motor performance. A novel advanced mapping technique was used in 102 tumors within M1 or CorticoSpinal-Tract to identify M1-two components. High-Frequency-stimulation (2-5 pulses) with an on-line qualitative and quantitative analysis of motor responses was used; the two components' cortical/subcortical spatial distribution correlated to clinical, tumor-related factor and patients' motor outcome; a cohort treated with standard-mapping was used for comparison. The two functional components were always identified on-line; in tumors not affecting M1, its functional segregation was preserved. In M1 tumors, two architectures, both preserving the two components, were disclosed: in 50%, a normal cortical/subcortical architecture emerged, while 50% revealed a distorted architecture with loss of anatomical reference and somatotopy, not associated with tumor histo-molecular features or volume, but with a previous treatment. Motor performance was maintained, suggesting functional compensation. By preserving the highest and resecting the lowest excitability component, the complete-resection increased with low morbidity. The real-time identification of two M1 functional components and the preservation of the highest excitability one increases safe resection, revealing M1 plasticity potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.