Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359691›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Differential Effects of Combined ATR/WEE1 Inhibition in Cancer Cells.

Gro Elise Rødland, Sissel Hauge, Grete Hasvold, Lilli T E Bay, Tine T H Raabe, Mrinal Joel, Randi G Syljuåsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gro Elise RødlandDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Sissel HaugeDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Grete HasvoldDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Lilli T E BayDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Tine T H RaabeDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Mrinal JoelDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Randi G SyljuåsenDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, N-0379 Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitors of WEE1 and ATR kinases are considered promising for cancer treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy. Here, we addressed whether simultaneous inhibition of WEE1 and ATR might be advantageous. Effects of the WEE1 inhibitor MK1775 and ATR inhibitor VE822 were investigated in U2OS osteosarcoma cells and in four lung cancer cell lines, H460, A549, H1975, and SW900, with different sensitivities to the WEE1 inhibitor. Despite the differences in cytotoxic effects, the WEE1 inhibitor reduced the inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK, leading to increased CDK activity accompanied by ATR activation in all cell lines. However, combining ATR inhibition with WEE1 inhibition could not fully compensate for cell resistance to the WEE1 inhibitor and reduced cell viability to a variable extent. The decreased cell viability upon the combined treatment correlated with a synergistic induction of DNA damage in S-phase in U2OS cells but not in the lung cancer cells. Moreover, less synergy was found between ATR and WEE1 inhibitors upon co-treatment with radiation, suggesting that single inhibitors may be preferable together with radiotherapy. Altogether, our results support that combining WEE1 and ATR inhibitors may be beneficial for cancer treatment in some cases, but also highlight that the effects vary between cancer cell lines.

Indexed as

ATR kinaseCDK activitycombination therapylung cancerradiosensitizationreplication stresssynergyWEE1 kinase

Identifiers

PMID34359691
PMCPMC8345075
OpenAlexW3183736237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.