Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359651›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Glioblastoma: Emerging Treatments and Novel Trial Designs.

Vincenzo Di Nunno, Enrico Franceschi, Alicia Tosoni, Lidia Gatto, Raffaele Lodi, Stefania Bartolini, Alba Ariela Brandes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincenzo Di NunnoDepartment of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Enrico FranceschiDepartment of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9332-4677
Alicia TosoniDepartment of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Lidia GattoDepartment of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Raffaele LodiIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Stefania BartoliniDepartment of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Alba Ariela BrandesDepartment of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of glioblastoma is a clinical challenge since very few systemic treatments have shown clinical efficacy in recurrent disease. Thanks to an increased knowledge of the biological and molecular mechanisms related to disease progression and growth, promising novel treatment strategies are emerging. The expanding availability of innovative compounds requires the design of a new generation of clinical trials, testing experimental compounds in a short time and tailoring the sample cohort based on molecular and clinical behaviors. In this review, we focused our attention on the assessment of promising novel treatment approaches, discussing novel trial design and possible future fields of development in this setting.

Indexed as

GBMglioblastomanewly diagnosed glioblastomanew trial designrecurrent glioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID34359651
PMCPMC8345198
OpenAlexW3186823088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.