Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359639›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Mouse Models in Meningioma Research: A Systematic Review.

Julien Boetto, Matthieu Peyre, Michel Kalamarides

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Molecular and Immunological Landscape of Meningiomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Gene replacement therapy in a schwannoma mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 2.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Modeling Brain Tumors: A Perspective Overview ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julien BoettoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier Universitary Hospital Center, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-8594
Matthieu PeyreInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013 Paris, France.
Michel KalamaridesInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225, F-75013 Paris, France.

Funding

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Poste Accueil INSERM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most frequent primitive central nervous system tumors found in adults. Mouse models of cancer have been instrumental in understanding disease mechanisms and establishing preclinical drug testing. Various mouse models of meningioma have been developed over time, evolving in light of new discoveries in our comprehension of meningioma biology and with improvements in genetic engineering techniques. We reviewed all mouse models of meningioma described in the literature, including xenograft models (orthotopic or heterotopic) with human cell lines or patient derived tumors, and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). Xenograft models provided useful tools for preclinical testing of a huge range of innovative drugs and therapeutic options, which are summarized in this review. GEMMs offer the possibility of mimicking human meningiomas at the histological, anatomical, and genetic level and have been invaluable in enabling tumorigenesis mechanisms, including initiation and progression, to be dissected. Currently, researchers have a range of different mouse models that can be used depending on the scientific question to be answered.

Indexed as

GEMMmeningiomamouse modelxenograft

Identifiers

PMID34359639
PMCPMC8345085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.