Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359610›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Machine Learning Models to Predict Survival Outcomes According to the Surgical Approach of Primary Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer.

Se Ik Kim, Sungyoung Lee, Chel Hun Choi, Maria Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, Hee Seung Kim, Kidong Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae Hong No, Jae-Weon Kim and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Se Ik KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9790-6735
Sungyoung LeeDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Chel Hun ChoiSamsung Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Maria LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8017-3176
Dong Hoon SuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
Hee Seung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Kidong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9254-6024
Hyun Hoon ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jae Hong NoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
Jae-Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Noh Hyun ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Yong-Sang SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7115-4021
Yong Beom KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1196-369X
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We purposed to develop machine learning models predicting survival outcomes according to the surgical approach for radical hysterectomy (RH) in early cervical cancer. In total, 1056 patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB cervical cancer who underwent primary type C RH by either open or laparoscopic surgery were included in this multicenter retrospective study. The whole dataset consisting of patients' clinicopathologic data was split into training and test sets with a 4:1 ratio. Using the training set, we developed models predicting the probability of 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with tenfold cross validation. The developed models were validated in the test set. In terms of predictive performance, we measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values. The logistic regression models comprised of preoperative variables yielded AUCs of 0.679 and 0.715 for predicting 5-year PFS and OS rates, respectively. Combining both logistic regression and multiple machine learning models, we constructed hybrid ensemble models, and these models showed much improved predictive performance, with 0.741 and 0.759 AUCs for predicting 5-year PFS and OS rates, respectively. We successfully developed models predicting disease recurrence and mortality after primary RH in patients with early cervical cancer. As the predicted value is calculated based on the preoperative factors, such as the surgical approach, these ensemble models would be useful for making decisions when choosing between open or laparoscopic RH.

Indexed as

cervical cancerhysterectomylaparoscopymachine learningminimally invasive surgeryrecurrencesurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID34359610
PMCPMC8345043
OpenAlexW3186102299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.