Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359357›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

HE4 in the Diagnostic Approach of Endometrial Cancer in Patients with Postmenopausal Bleeding, the METRODEC Protocol: Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Manon Degez, Hélène Caillon, Anne Chauviré-Drouard, Maxime Leroy, David Lair, Norbert Winer, Thibault Thubert, Pauline Le Floch, Valérie Desroys du Roure, Mélanie Randet and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Manon DegezService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
Hélène CaillonService de Biochimie, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
Anne Chauviré-DrouardCentre d'Investigation Clinique CIC 1413, INSERM, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
Maxime LeroyPlateforme de Biométries et Biostatistiques, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
David LairDépartement Promotion, Direction de la Recherche, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
Norbert WinerService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
Thibault ThubertService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.
Pauline Le FlochUnité de Recherche Clinique, CH de Saint-Nazaire, 44600 Saint-Nazaire, France.
Valérie Desroys du RoureUnité de Recherche Clinique, CH Départemental Vendée, 85000 La Roche sur Yon, France.
Mélanie RandetService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CH de Saint-Nazaire, 44600 Saint-Nazaire, France.
Guillaume DucarmeService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CH Départemental Vendée, 85000 La Roche sur Yon, France.
Vincent DochezService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8077-0288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer is the most common pelvic gynecological cancer in France. The most frequent symptom is post-menopausal bleeding and is one of the primary reasons for consultation in gynecological emergencies. The treatment is very codified and consists of a surgical intervention for anatomopathological analysis. The latter is frequently reassuring. These interventions are often performed in mild situations and there is currently no element to be sufficiently reassuring to avoid surgery. This study aims to explore the sensitivity of an innovative marker: Human Epididymis 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis approach of endometrial cancer in case of postmenopausal bleedings.

methodsThis is a prospective multicenter diagnostic study with three centers involved. Inclusion criteria are any patient with post-menopausal bleeding who is to undergo hysteroscopy, endometrial biopsy, or endometrial resection. In accordance with the recommendations for the management of post-menopausal bleedings, the medical conduct consists of performing a clinical examination, an ultrasound and, in general, even in case of paraclinical examination reassuring, an anatomopathological analysis. This pathological analysis can be obtained in several ways: biopsy, hysteroscopy-curettage (which is the most frequently performed surgery), and hysterectomy. Our protocol consists of taking a blood sample from each woman who will undergo one of the interventions mentioned above. The dosage of HE4 and CA125 requires the withdrawal of an additional heparinized tube during the preoperative assessment usually performed. This research is therefore classified as non-interventional. The primary outcome is to evaluate the sensitivity of the HE4 marker in patients with postmenopausal bleeding in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The secondary outcomes are other parameters (specificity, VPP, VPN) of HE4, Evaluating the diagnostic capabilities of the CA125 marker alone and associated with HE4, as well as those of the REM and REM-B algorithms. We aim to include 100 patients over a period of one year in three centers. DISCUSSION: As of now, there is no biological marker used in routine practice in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The ultimate goal of HE4 in endometrial cancer is to avoid surgery for those who are identified as non-sick. This study is the precursor of others for use in routine practice, HE4 would represent a great help to diagnosis if our study demonstrates it as reliable in the management of these patients and avoid many unnecessary and risky surgeries.

Indexed as

CA125endometrial cancerHE4human epididymis protein 4hysteroscopypostmenopausal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID34359357
PMCPMC8304032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.