Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359349›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Randomized Trial to Improve Primary Care Patient Management and Patient Outcomes Using a Drug-Drug Interaction Test: Confirmation of the DECART Simulated Patient Clinical Utility Trial Results.

John Peabody, Joshua Schrecker, Rebecca Heltsley, David Paculdo, Enrico de Belen, Diana Tamondong-Lachica, M Czarina Acelajado, Othman Ouenes, Trina Kennedy, Elaine Jeter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John PeabodyCollege of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0210-9232
Joshua SchreckerAegis Sciences Corporation, Nashville, TN 37228, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9731-123X
Rebecca HeltsleyAegis Sciences Corporation, Nashville, TN 37228, USA.
David PaculdoQURE Healthcare, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2184-4603
Enrico de BelenQURE Healthcare, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.
Diana Tamondong-LachicaQURE Healthcare, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.
M Czarina AcelajadoQURE Healthcare, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.
Othman OuenesQURE Healthcare, San Francisco, CA 94133, USA.
Trina KennedyTJK Consulting, Sandpoint, ID 83864, USA.
Elaine JeterAegis Sciences Corporation, Nashville, TN 37228, USA.
AEgis Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Aegis Sciences Corporation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a serious problem in the healthcare system, leading to excess healthcare utilization and costs. We conducted a second prospective randomized, controlled trial to further establish the real-world clinical utility of a novel assay that objectively identifies potentially serious DDIs in real-world patients. Re-recruiting primary care physicians (PCPs) from our first randomized, controlled, simulated-patients study on DDIs, we experimentally introduced a definitive, urine-based mass spectrometry test intervention that the physicians could use when caring for their eligible patients. Patients were eligible if taking four or more prescription medications or suspected of taking other non-prescribed substances with potential medication interactions. The primary outcome was whether DDI testing changed clinical care. We explored a secondary outcome to see if the change in practice improved symptoms in patients with potential DDIs. A total of 169 control and 162 intervention patients were enrolled in the study, and their medical records were abstracted. In real-world patients, intervention physicians identified and/or treated a DDI at 3.0x the rate in their patient population compared to controls (21.6% vs. 7.1%,

Indexed as

clinical utilitydrug–drug interactionsfamily medicineinternal medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34359349
PMCPMC8307579
OpenAlexW3181875454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.