Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359329›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Using Slit-Lamp Images for Deep Learning-Based Identification of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis: Model Development and Validation with Different Convolutional Neural Networks.

Ning Hung, Andy Kuan-Yu Shih, Chihung Lin, Ming-Tse Kuo, Yih-Shiou Hwang, Wei-Chi Wu, Chang-Fu Kuo, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang, Ching-Hsi Hsiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Artificial intelligence in the anterior segment of eye diseases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ning HungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Andy Kuan-Yu ShihCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Chihung LinCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1079-7327
Ming-Tse KuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Rd, Niaosong, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4159-0564
Yih-Shiou HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Wei-Chi WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Chang-Fu KuoCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Eugene Yu-Chuan KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6814-6530
Ching-Hsi HsiaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, No. 5 Fu-Hsin Rd, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CLRPG3H0012, CIRPG3H0012, and CMRPG1K0051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning model for identifying bacterial keratitis (BK) and fungal keratitis (FK) by using slit-lamp images. We retrospectively collected slit-lamp images of patients with culture-proven microbial keratitis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 from two medical centers in Taiwan. We constructed a deep learning algorithm consisting of a segmentation model for cropping cornea images and a classification model that applies different convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to differentiate between FK and BK. The CNNs included DenseNet121, DenseNet161, DenseNet169, DenseNet201, EfficientNetB3, InceptionV3, ResNet101, and ResNet50. The model performance was evaluated and presented as the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves. A gradient-weighted class activation mapping technique was used to plot the heat map of the model. By using 1330 images from 580 patients, the deep learning algorithm achieved the highest average accuracy of 80.0%. Using different CNNs, the diagnostic accuracy for BK ranged from 79.6% to 95.9%, and that for FK ranged from 26.3% to 65.8%. The CNN of DenseNet161 showed the best model performance, with an AUC of 0.85 for both BK and FK. The heat maps revealed that the model was able to identify the corneal infiltrations. The model showed a better diagnostic accuracy than the previously reported diagnostic performance of both general ophthalmologists and corneal specialists.

Indexed as

cropped corneal imagedeep learninginfectious keratitisslit-lamp images

Identifiers

PMID34359329
PMCPMC8307675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.