Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359313›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Strength Measurements Using a Pull Hand-Held Dynamometer Fixed to the Examiner's Body and Comparison with Push Dynamometry.

Javier González-Rosalén, Josep Carles Benítez-Martínez, Francesc Medina-Mirapeix, Alba Cuerda-Del Pino, Antonio Cervelló, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javier González-RosalénDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, CP 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5395-317X
Josep Carles Benítez-MartínezDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, CP 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-0668
Francesc Medina-MirapeixDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Murcia, CP 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Alba Cuerda-Del PinoDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, CP 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Antonio CervellóDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of Valencia, CP 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-2743
Rodrigo Martín-San AgustínDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, CP 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-0189
Universitat de València · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hand held dynamometers (HHDs) are the most used method to measure strength in clinical sitting. There are two methods to realize the assessment: pull and push. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a new measurement modality for pull HHD and to compare the inter-rater reliability and agreement of the measurements. Forty healthy subjects were evaluated by two assessors with different body composition and manual strength. Fifteen isometric tests were performed in two sessions with a one-week interval between them. Reliability was examined using the intra-class correlation (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). Agreement between raters was examined using paired

Indexed as

hand-held dynamometerlower limbpullpushreliabilitystrengthupper limb

Identifiers

PMID34359313
PMCPMC8303393
OpenAlexW3182884350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.