Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34359295›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Dilated Semantic Segmentation for Breast Ultrasonic Lesion Detection Using Parallel Feature Fusion.

Rizwana Irfan, Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi, Hafiz Tayyab Rauf, Robertas Damaševičius, Emad Abouel Nasr, Abdelatty E Abdelgawad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Survey of Convolutional Neural Network in Breast Cancer.Computer modeling in engineering & sciences : CMES · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rizwana IrfanDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computing and Information Technology at Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulwahab Ali AlmazroiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computing and Information Technology at Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia.
Hafiz Tayyab RaufCentre for Smart Systems, AI and Cybersecurity, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1515-3187
Robertas DamaševičiusFaculty of Applied Mathematics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9990-1084
Emad Abouel NasrIndustrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6967-7747
Abdelatty E AbdelgawadIndustrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3276-8068
King Saud University · SAUniversity of Jeddah · SASilesian University of Technology · PLUniversity of Staffordshire · GB

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University RG-1439-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is becoming more dangerous by the day. The death rate in developing countries is rapidly increasing. As a result, early detection of breast cancer is critical, leading to a lower death rate. Several researchers have worked on breast cancer segmentation and classification using various imaging modalities. The ultrasonic imaging modality is one of the most cost-effective imaging techniques, with a higher sensitivity for diagnosis. The proposed study segments ultrasonic breast lesion images using a Dilated Semantic Segmentation Network (Di-CNN) combined with a morphological erosion operation. For feature extraction, we used the deep neural network DenseNet201 with transfer learning. We propose a 24-layer CNN that uses transfer learning-based feature extraction to further validate and ensure the enriched features with target intensity. To classify the nodules, the feature vectors obtained from DenseNet201 and the 24-layer CNN were fused using parallel fusion. The proposed methods were evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation on various vector combinations. The accuracy of CNN-activated feature vectors and DenseNet201-activated feature vectors combined with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was 90.11 percent and 98.45 percent, respectively. With 98.9 percent accuracy, the fused version of the feature vector with SVM outperformed other algorithms. When compared to recent algorithms, the proposed algorithm achieves a better breast cancer diagnosis rate.

Indexed as

CNNDenseNet201Di-CNNdilationparallel feature fusionsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34359295
PMCPMC8304124
OpenAlexW3179013378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.