Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34358444›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

A neuronal mechanism controlling the choice between feeding and sexual behaviors in Drosophila.

Sherry J Cheriyamkunnel, Saloni Rose, Pedro F Jacob, Lauren A Blackburn, Shaleen Glasgow, Jacob Moorse, Mike Winstanley, Patrick J Moynihan, Scott Waddell, Carolina Rezaval

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hunger Recruits a Parallel Circuit Encoding Alcohol Reward.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The neuropeptide drosulfakinin enhances choosiness and protects males from the aging effects of social perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sherry J CheriyamkunnelSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Saloni RoseSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Pedro F JacobCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Lauren A BlackburnSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Shaleen GlasgowSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Jacob MoorseSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Mike WinstanleySchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Patrick J MoynihanSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Scott WaddellCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Carolina RezavalSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Electronic address: c.rezaval@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S009299/1Wellcome Trust 200846/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 214062/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals must express the appropriate behavior that meets their most pressing physiological needs and their environmental context. However, it is currently unclear how alternative behavioral options are evaluated and appropriate actions are prioritized. Here, we describe how fruit flies choose between feeding and courtship; two behaviors necessary for survival and reproduction. We show that sex- and food-deprived male flies prioritize feeding over courtship initiation, and manipulation of food quality or the animal's internal state fine-tunes this decision. We identify the tyramine signaling pathway as an essential mediator of this decision. Tyramine biosynthesis is regulated by the fly's nutritional state and acts as a satiety signal, favoring courtship over feeding. Tyramine inhibits a subset of feeding-promoting tyramine receptor (TyrR)-expressing neurons and activates P1 neurons, a known command center for courtship. Conversely, the perception of a nutritious food source activates TyrR neurons and inhibits P1 neurons. Therefore, TyrR and P1 neurons are oppositely modulated by starvation, via tyramine levels, and food availability. We propose that antagonistic co-regulation of neurons controlling alternative actions is key to prioritizing competing drives in a context- dependent manner.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterMaleNeuronsSexual Behavior, AnimalTyramineDrosophila ProteinsTyramineaction selectioncourtshipdecision-makingDrosophilafeedingmatingmotivationsensory conflicttyramine

Identifiers

PMID34358444
PMCPMC8538064
OpenAlexW3188474988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.