Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34358443›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

Cell-type-specific Hox regulatory strategies orchestrate tissue identity.

Ryan Loker, Jordyn E Sanner, Richard S Mann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biology of Hox Genes: Questions and Technological Challenges.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of the Hox Genes,International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Overexpression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Hox genes in development and beyond.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  14. Characterisation of the role and regulation ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Flight or protection: the genesProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SpyChIP identifies cell type-specific transcription factor occupancy from complex tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Fluorescent labeling of genomic loci inCell reports methods · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan LokerDepartment of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jordyn E SannerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Richard S MannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: rsm10@columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Interpreting and Deploying Genomic Information During Animal DevelopmentR35GM118336 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RICHARD S MANN · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Proximo-distal Patterning inthe Drosophila appendegesR01GM058575 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MANN, RICHARD S · 1999 to 2016
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058575NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hox proteins are homeodomain transcription factors that diversify serially homologous segments along the animal body axis, as revealed by the classic bithorax phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster, in which mutations in Ultrabithorax (Ubx) transform the third thoracic segment into the likeness of the second thoracic segment. To specify segment identity, we show that Ubx both increases and decreases chromatin accessibility, coinciding with its dual role as both an activator and repressor of transcription. However, the choice of transcriptional activity executed by Ubx is spatially regulated and depends on the availability of cofactors, with Ubx acting as a repressor in some populations and as an activator in others. Ubx-mediated changes to chromatin accessibility positively and negatively affect the binding of Scalloped (Sd), a transcription factor that is required for appendage development in both segments. These findings illustrate how a single Hox protein can modify complex gene regulatory networks to transform the identity of an entire tissue.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsChromatinGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription FactorsWings, AnimalChromatinDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription FactorsUbx protein, Drosophilaappendage developmentbithoraxDrosophila melanogasterhaltereHox cofactorsHox genesserial homologyUbxUltrabithoraxwing

Identifiers

PMID34358443
PMCPMC8511240
OpenAlexW3192469487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.