ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2022
Clinical experience with non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders.
Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is It Feasible to Screen for Fetal De Novo or Paternally Inherited Pathogenic Single Nucleotide Variants in Maternal Plasma Cell-Free DNA? A Systematic Literature Review.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Pooled it
- Abnormalities of pubertal development and gonadal function in Noonan syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Enhancing Prenatal Genetic Evaluation Through the Combination of Single-Gene Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening and Prenatal Imaging.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Review
- Pathways to enhancing prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Discrepant Results on Two Different Single Gene Non-invasive Prenatal Tests for Cystic Fibrosis: A Case Report.AJP reports · 2026Article
- Genetic counselors' perspectives on the expanded use of non-invasive prenatal testing.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Clinical application value of preconception and prenatal carrier screening in Yinchuan.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Clinical Feasibility of Early First-Trimester Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Associations Between Gestational Age, Fetal Fraction, and No-Call Rates.The application of clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Progress, clinical application and challenges of non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic diseases.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Identification of maternalAnnals of medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing: Emerging Technologies and Evolving Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating the Continuum of Genetic Testing From Fetus to Neonate: A Review of Prenatal Genetic Testing and the Overlap With Newborn Testing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding preconception or early pregnancy single-gene genetic disease screening among reproductive-aged individuals.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Uptake rates for non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders associated with advanced paternal age.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cell-free-DNA-based diagnostics.Genome research · 2025Review
- The Art (and Science) of Individualized Selection of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS).International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Association of Very RareGenes · 2024Article
- The Evolving Role of Genetic Evaluation in the Prenatal Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Prospective prenatal cell-free DNA screening for genetic conditions of heterogenous etiologies.Nature medicine · 2024Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the performance of a non-invasive prenatal screening test (NIPT) for a panel of dominant single-gene disorders (SGD) with a combined population incidence of 1 in 600.
methodsCell-free fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma samples accessioned from 14 April 2017 to 27 November 2019 was analyzed by next-generation sequencing, targeting 30 genes, to look for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants implicated in 25 dominant conditions. The conditions included Noonan spectrum disorders, skeletal disorders, craniosynostosis syndromes, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Alagille syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, epileptic encephalopathy, SYNGAP1-related intellectual disability, CHARGE syndrome, Sotos syndrome and Rett syndrome. NIPT-SGD was made available as a clinical service to women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥ 9 weeks' gestation, with testing on maternal and paternal genomic DNA to assist in interpretation. A minimum of 4.5% fetal fraction was required for test interpretation. Variants identified in the mother were deemed inconclusive with respect to fetal carrier status. Confirmatory prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing was recommended for all screen-positive patients and follow-up information was requested. The screen-positive rates with respect to the clinical indication for testing were evaluated.
resultsA NIPT-SGD result was available for 2208 women, of which 125 (5.7%) were positive. Elevated test-positive rates were observed for referrals with a family history of a disorder on the panel (20/132 (15.2%)) or a primary indication of fetal long-bone abnormality (60/178 (33.7%)), fetal craniofacial abnormality (6/21 (28.6%)), fetal lymphatic abnormality (20/150 (13.3%)) or major fetal cardiac defect (4/31 (12.9%)). For paternal age ≥ 40 years as a sole risk factor, the test-positive rate was 2/912 (0.2%). Of the 125 positive cases, follow-up information was available for 67 (53.6%), with none classified as false-positive. No false-negative cases were identified.
conclusionsNIPT can assist in the early detection of a set of SGD, particularly when either abnormal ultrasound findings or a family history is present. Additional clinical studies are needed to evaluate the optimal design of the gene panel, define target populations and assess patient acceptability. NIPT-SGD offers a safe and early prenatal screening option. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.