Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34358260›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Prevalence of dermatological toxicities in patients with melanoma undergoing immunotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Náthali Felícia Mineiro Dos Santos Garrett, Ana Cristina Carvalho da Costa, Elaine Barros Ferreira, Giovanni Damiani, Paula Elaine Diniz Dos Reis, Christiane Inocêncio Vasques

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dynamized ultra-low dilution ofCell adhesion & migration · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Surgical Treatment of Vitiligo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Skin Manifestation Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Náthali Felícia Mineiro Dos Santos GarrettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4799-6880
Ana Cristina Carvalho da CostaDepartment of Health of the Federal District, Brasília, Brazil.
Elaine Barros FerreiraSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Giovanni DamianiClinical Dermatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Paula Elaine Diniz Dos ReisSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Christiane Inocêncio VasquesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9586-9486
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCheckpoint inhibitors have revolutionized advanced melanoma care; however, their cutaneous side effects have not been definitively elucidated.

objectiveTo identify the prevalence of cutaneous toxicity in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy and/or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, which encompassed both clinical trials and observational studies describing the dermatological toxicities in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review under the number CRD42018091915. The searches were performed using the CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data.

resultsA total of 9,802 articles were identified in the databases. The final sample comprised 39 studies. The evaluated drugs were ipilimumab, tremelimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab. The results suggest that the most prevalent side effect was grade 1 and 2 pruritus (24%), followed by grade 1 and 2 rash (21%) and grade 1 and 2 vitiligo (10%).

conclusionThe most prevalent side effects in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are pruritus, rash, and vitiligo, and they are rated mostly as grades 1 and 2 adverse events. Remarkably, vitiligo is most commonly found in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedClinical Trials as TopicExanthemaFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabObservational Studies as TopicPrevalencePruritusSkin NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabpembrolizumabtremelimumab

Identifiers

PMID34358260
PMCPMC8345892
OpenAlexW3192166808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.