Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34358185›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Evaluation of Flu Vaccination Coverage among Healthcare Workers during a 3 Years' Study Period and Attitude towards Influenza and Potential COVID-19 Vaccination in the Context of the Pandemic.

Giuditta Scardina, Luca Ceccarelli, Virginia Casigliani, Sara Mazzilli, Marco Napoletano, Martina Padovan, Armando Petillo, Daniele Sironi, Cinzia Brilli, Vittorio Gattini and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuditta ScardinaDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Luca CeccarelliDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Virginia CasiglianiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-2648
Sara MazzilliDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Marco NapoletanoDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Martina PadovanDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Armando PetilloDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Daniele SironiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-3506
Cinzia BrilliDivision of Occupational & Preventive Medicine, Santa Chiara Hospital, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Vittorio GattiniDivision of Occupational & Preventive Medicine, Santa Chiara Hospital, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Lara TavoschiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2217-4664
Rudy FoddisDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni GuglielmiDivision of Occupational & Preventive Medicine, Santa Chiara Hospital, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Gaetano Pierpaolo PriviteraDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
Angelo BaggianiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56121 Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) against seasonal influenza is considered the most effective way to protect HCWs, ensure patient's safety and to maintain essential health care services during influenza epidemics. With the present study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of incremental bundles of measures implemented during the last three flu campaigns and to assess the attitudes towards influenza vaccination and a potential vaccine against COVID-19 among HCWs, in a large university hospital in Pisa, Italy. (2) Methods: We described measures implemented during 2018/2019, 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 and assessed their impact on flu vaccine coverage (VC) among employees and residents in Pisa university hospital. We considered sex, profession and ward to investigate differences in uptake. In addition, in 2020 a survey was developed and distributed to all employees to evaluate flu and COVID-19 vaccines attitudes. (3) Results: during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 flu campaigns the overall VC rate among HCWs was, respectively, 10.2% and 11.9%. In 2020/21 the overall VC rate jumped to 39.3% (+ 230.6%). Results from the survey indicated a more positive attitude towards flu vaccine as compared to COVID-19 vaccines among the 10.6% of the staff members who responded to the survey. In addition, 70.97% of HCWs totally agreed that being vaccinated against influenza would be more important than the previous years because of COVID-19 emergency. (4) Conclusions: a significant increase in VC was observed in 2020/21, especially among those sub-groups with consistently lower uptake in previous years. The COVID-19 pandemic positively influenced flu vaccination uptake during the 2020/21 season.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccineflu vaccination campaignshealthcare workersvaccine coveragevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34358185
PMCPMC8310181
OpenAlexW3178757135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.