Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34358160›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Immunogenicity Studies of Plant-Produced SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain-Based Subunit Vaccine Candidate with Different Adjuvant Formulations.

Konlavat Siriwattananon, Suwimon Manopwisedjaroen, Balamurugan Shanmugaraj, Eakachai Prompetchara, Chutitorn Ketloy, Supranee Buranapraditkun, Kittipan Tharakhet, Papatsara Kaewpang, Kiat Ruxrungtham, Arunee Thitithanyanont and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Plant-Derived Human Vaccines: Recent Developments.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Konlavat SiriwattananonResearch Unit for Plant-Produced Pharmaceuticals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Suwimon ManopwisedjaroenDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Balamurugan ShanmugarajBaiya Phytopharm Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Eakachai PrompetcharaCenter of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development (Chula Vaccine Research Center, Chula VRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chutitorn KetloyCenter of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development (Chula Vaccine Research Center, Chula VRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Supranee BuranapraditkunCenter of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development (Chula Vaccine Research Center, Chula VRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Kittipan TharakhetCenter of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development (Chula Vaccine Research Center, Chula VRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Papatsara KaewpangCenter of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development (Chula Vaccine Research Center, Chula VRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Kiat RuxrungthamCenter of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development (Chula Vaccine Research Center, Chula VRC), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Arunee ThitithanyanontDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Waranyoo PhoolcharoenResearch Unit for Plant-Produced Pharmaceuticals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5958-7406
Chulalongkorn University · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

Baiya Phytopharm Co., Ltd. NoNational Research Council of Thailand No
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rapid transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causing serious public health problems and economic burden, the development of effective vaccines is a high priority for controlling the virus spread. Our group has previously demonstrated that the plant-produced receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 fused with Fc of human IgG was capable of eliciting potent neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses in animal studies, and the immunogenicity could be improved by the addition of an alum adjuvant. Here, we performed a head-to-head comparison of different commercially available adjuvants, including aluminum hydroxide gel (alum), AddaVax (MF59), monophosphoryl lipid A from

Indexed as

adjuvantCOVID-19plant-based vaccinereceptor-binding domainSARS-CoV-2subunit vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34358160
PMCPMC8310282
OpenAlexW3179238217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.