Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357832›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines among medical students in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study.

Mei Li, Yu Zheng, Yue Luo, Jianlan Ren, Linrui Jiang, Jian Tang, Xingli Yu, Dongmei Luo, Dinglin Fan, Yanhua Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mei LiSchool of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-2603
Yu ZhengDepartment of Rheumatism and Immunology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Yue LuoSchool of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Jianlan RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Linrui JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Jian TangDepartment of Central Sterile Supply, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xingli YuThe Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Dongmei LuoSchool of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Dinglin FanSchool of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Yanhua ChenDepartment of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is an obstacle to COVID-19 vaccination. This study aims to inform the vaccine hesitancy and analyze related factors toward COVID-19 vaccination among medical students in China, so as to provide suggestions for increasing vaccines uptake. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students in a medical university and a health school. A total of 2,196 valid questionnaires were received. 41.2% vaccine hesitancy was reported among medical students in total. Female (OR = 1.336) and individuals with higher education (OR = 1.724) reported slightly higher vaccine hesitancy. Being in low-risk areas and no need to get vaccinated (OR = 2.285), fear of serious consequences of vaccination (OR = 1.929), being in good health and no need to be vaccinated (OR = 1.891), being concerned about short-term side effects (OR = 1.793) and being concerned that the vaccine was ineffective (OR = 1.694) had higher prevalence of vaccine hesitancy. Those who were believing the specialty of study or work environment made vaccination necessary (OR = 0.378), believing they were susceptible to COVID-19 (OR = 0.411) and the vaccine was free (OR = 0.519) were more willing to get vaccinated. Confidence in vaccines and perceptions of benefits and risk are associated with vaccine hesitancy. It is important to strengthen vaccine health literacy education for medical students and enhance vaccine confidence. Countries need to supervise the public opinions in social media, television broadcasting and other media, so as to ensure the correct orientation of public opinion. Open and transparent evidence-based information is also needed which can help improve the vaccination coverage rate of the public.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesacceptanceCOVID-19medical studentsVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34357832
PMCPMC8828057
OpenAlexW3188590594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.