Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357691›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Repetitive saliva-based mass screening as a tool for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission in nursing homes.

Claude Saegerman, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Niko Speybroeck, Anh Nguyet Diep, Alexandria Williams, Lambert Stamatakis, Wouter Coppieters, Fabienne Michel, Christophe Breuer, Margaux Dandoy and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claude SaegermanFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH) Center, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-7436
Anne-Françoise DonneauRisk Assessment Group COVID-19, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-6289
Niko SpeybroeckResearch Institute of Health and Society, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-3502
Anh Nguyet DiepBiostatistics Unit, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-3220
Alexandria WilliamsP95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Leuven, Belgium.
Lambert StamatakisGeneral Delegation COVID-19, Government of the Walloon Region, Namur, Belgium.
Wouter CoppietersUnit of Animal Genomics, GIGA Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Fabienne MichelRisk Assessment Group COVID-19, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Christophe BreuerLiège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-5717
Margaux DandoyCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Olivier EkCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Claire GourzonesCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Joey SchynsCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Emeline GoffinCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Frédéric MinnerCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Véronique RenaultFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH) Center, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2529-3965
Laurent GilletFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH) Center, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-2525
Fabrice BureauCovid-19 Platform, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6264-4029
University of Liège · BEde Duve Institute · BEFlemish Government · BE

Funding

Gouvernement Wallon
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing home (NH) residents and staff have been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to examine the use of weekly saliva RT-qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection among NH workers as a strategy to control disease transmission within NHs in Belgium. From 16 November to 27 December 2020, a voluntary and anonymous weekly screening was implemented in a cohort of 50,000 workers across 572 NHs in the Walloon region of Belgium to detect asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 via saliva RT-qPCR testing and using the Diagenode saliva sample collection device. Positive workers were isolated to avoid subsequent infections in residents and other staff. RT-qPCR testing was based on pooled saliva sampling techniques from three workers, followed by individual testing of each positive or inconclusive pool. The majority of NHs (85%) and 55% of their workers participated. Pooling did not affect sensitivity as it only induced a very decrease in sensitivity estimated as 0.33%. Significant decreases in the prevalence (34.4-13.4%) and incidence of NHs with either single (13.8-2%) or multiple positive workers (3.7-0%) were observed over time. In addition, deaths among NH residents and NH worker absences decreased significantly over time. Weekly saliva RT-qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated large-scale feasibility and efficacy in disrupting the chain of transmission. Implementation of this testing strategy in NHs could also be extended to other settings with the aim to control viral transmission for maintaining essential activities.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AnimalsClinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingHumansMass ScreeningNursing HomesPandemicsSalivaBelgiumCOVID-19nursing homeRT-qPCRsaliva testSARS-CoV-2worker

Identifiers

PMID34357691
PMCPMC8446975
OpenAlexW3189173342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.