Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357685›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2022

Qualitative examination of the attitudes of healthcare workers in Turkey regarding COVID-19 vaccines.

Ozgur Sema Aci, Ozlem Kackin, Selver Karaaslan, Emre Ciydem

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence, nature, and determinants of COVID-19-related conspiracy theories among healthcare workers: a scoping review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Qualitative evaluation of reasons for healthcare professionals being unvaccinated against COVID-19.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ozgur Sema AciPhD in Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Independent Researcher, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-0579
Ozlem KackinResearch Assistant, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Office Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-0343
Selver KaraaslanAssistant Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Health, Department of Nursing, Van, Turkey.
Emre CiydemResearch Assistant, Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital · TRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRPsychiatric Association of Turkey · TRVan Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe attitudes of healthcare workers toward COVID-19 vaccines ensure that health services are able to run without interruption and potentially have a role in the messaging about vaccination that they convey to the public. Hence, healthcare workers' attitudes ultimately have a significant role in controlling the pandemic. This study aimed to qualitatively investigate the attitudes of healthcare workers in Turkey in relation to COVID-19 vaccines.

methodsThe study used the phenomenological approach. The sample consisted of 36 healthcare workers who were employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected online using focus group interviews. A total of four focus group interviews were conducted.

findingsFollowing analysis of the data, the attitudes of healthcare workers in Turkey toward the COVID-19 vaccine were divided into three themes: "influencing factors," "priority group" and "trust."

conclusionsVaccination was found to create negative emotions among some of the healthcare workers. Their opinions about the COVID-19 vaccines were affected by the negative emotions and burnout they experienced during the pandemic. In addition, they saw the vaccination process as impacted by contraindications and uncertainty about the duration of the protection, the balance of the benefits and harm of the vaccines, and by vaccine myths and prejudices about the country where the vaccine was developed. Healthcare professionals expressed the need for trust to be established in the whole vaccination process. They suggested that different vaccine options should be offered, that the appointment and process notification system for vaccination should be improved, that evidence-based information about vaccines should be provided and that a safe environment should be created. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Vaccine hesitancy can be addressed by careful attention to the application of vaccination programs, correct and effective use of social media, transparent, and precise management of political processes, and the provision of evidence-based information about the vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsTurkeyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCoronavirushealthcare workerspandemicsqualitative researchTurkeyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34357685
PMCPMC8441789
OpenAlexW3189203593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.