ArticleElectrophoresis2021
Segmentation-based analysis of single-cell immunoblots.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell western blotting of cytoplasmic cytokeratin 8 proteoforms.The Analyst · 2025Article
- Single-cell western blotting of cytoplasmic cytokeratin 8 proteoforms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
From genomics to transcriptomics to proteomics, microfluidic tools underpin recent advances in single-cell biology. Detection of specific proteoforms-with single-cell resolution-presents challenges in detection specificity and sensitivity. Miniaturization of protein immunoblots to single-cell resolution mitigates these challenges. For example, in microfluidic western blotting, protein targets are separated by electrophoresis and subsequently detected using fluorescently labeled antibody probes. To quantify the expression level of each protein target, the fluorescent protein bands are fit to Gaussians; yet, this method is difficult to use with noisy, low-abundance, or low-SNR protein bands, and with significant band skew or dispersion. In this study, we investigate segmentation-based approaches to robustly quantify protein bands from single-cell protein immunoblots. As compared to a Gaussian fitting pipeline, the segmentation pipeline detects >1.5× more protein bands for downstream quantification as well as more of the low-abundance protein bands (i.e., with SNR ∼3). Utilizing deep learning-based segmentation approaches increases the recovery of low-SNR protein bands by an additional 50%. However, we find that segmentation-based approaches are less robust at quantifying poorly resolved protein bands (separation resolution, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.