Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357461›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

A simple qualitative scale for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux: high correlations with pH measurements and disease severity. The usefulness of the Warsaw Scale in LPR diagnostics compared to other diagnostic tools.

E Wlodarczyk, A Domeracka-Kolodziej, B Miaskiewicz, H Skarzynski, P H Skarzynski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E WlodarczykWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-5730
A Domeracka-KolodziejWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.
B MiaskiewiczWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-2355
H SkarzynskiWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-9851
P H SkarzynskiWorld Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland. p.skarzynski@ifps.org.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-1915
Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiagnosis and monitoring of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a constant challenge in otolaryngological practice, chiefly because there are no specific symptoms characteristic of the disease. In this paper, we present the validation of a simple, 6-level qualitative scale to gauge the clinical findings of LPR. It has been previously published in Polish as the Warsaw Scale.

methodsIn the study, we enrolled 100 patients with voice problems who had registered in our clinic, and we performed an extended battery of diagnostic tests for LPR, together with 24-h pH monitoring.

resultsThe Warsaw Scale significantly outperformed other instruments in both predicting LPR status and correlating with pH measurements. Moreover, the rating provided by the scale showed a strong association with patient-reported symptoms.

conclusionThe data indicate that the Warsaw Scale could be used as an affordable, consistent, and effective diagnostic and monitoring tool for LPR.

Indexed as

Laryngopharyngeal RefluxVoice DisordersDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEsophageal pH MonitoringHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSeverity of Illness IndexLaryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)Oropharyngeal pH monitoringWarsaw Scale

Identifiers

PMID34357461
PMCPMC8553686
OpenAlexW3191315056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.