Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357446›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Changed inflammatory markers after application of 4DryField PH for adhesion prevention in gynecological surgery.

Nicole Ziegler, Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche, Rajesh Devassy, Rudy Leon De Wilde

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feasibility and safety of 4DryFieldArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole ZieglerPius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany. nicole.ziegler@pius-hospital.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8619
Luz Angela Torres-de la RochePius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
Rajesh DevassyPius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
Rudy Leon De WildePius Hospital, University Hospital for Gynecology, University Medicine Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5759-9745
Pius Hospital Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of peritoneal adhesions and the effects of different antiadhesion agents on such mechanisms are not fully understood. Temporary rises of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level have been reported after antiadhesion agent application. We present the changes of inflammation markers observed after use of a starch-based polysaccharide certified for adhesion prevention and hemostasis 4DF (4DryField

methodRetrospective comparative analysis of inflammation markers in 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic adhesiolysis with or without adhesion prophylaxis was conducted. Statistical comparisons were performed by means of paired or unpaired t tests (for normally distributed continuous data), Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank tests or Mann-Whitney tests (for not-normally distributed continuous data), Mantel-Cox tests (for continuous data describing time intervals), and Fisher's exact tests (for discrete data).

resultsThe maximum post-operative CRP level was significantly elevated in the 4DF group (87 vs. 29%; p < 0.001), whereas leukocyte concentration and body temperature did not differ between groups. No signs of infection were detected in any of the patients and CRP levels spontaneously dropped to normal values within few days. No side effects or complications were observed in both groups. In second-look surgeries performed for other diagnoses 1-56 weeks after the first interventions, no remnants of 4DF or any peritoneal inflammatory reactions were observed.

conclusionThe starch-based polysaccharide 4DF can be considered safe and does not induce inflammatory reactions of clinical significance. Further studies regarding 4DF degradation are recommended and, apart from macrophage migration, could also examine corresponding markers such as IL-6 and PCT.

Indexed as

Peritoneal DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansRetrospective StudiesTissue AdhesionsAdhesiolysisAdhesion prophylaxisHemostasisInflammation markersPeritoneal adhesionStarch-based polysaccharide

Identifiers

PMID34357446
PMCPMC8429371
OpenAlexW3188268629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.