Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357439›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2021

A quantitative analysis of cerebellar anatomy in birds.

Felipe Cunha, Cristian Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, Kelsey Racicot, Douglas R Wylie, Andrew N Iwaniuk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Why birds are smart.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felipe CunhaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Dr. W, Science & Academic Building, SA8150, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 6T5, Canada. felipebrcunha@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-732X
Cristian Gutiérrez-IbáñezDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kelsey RacicotDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Dr. W, Science & Academic Building, SA8150, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 6T5, Canada.
Douglas R WylieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Andrew N IwaniukDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Dr. W, Science & Academic Building, SA8150, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 6T5, Canada.
University of Lethbridge · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation Andrew Iwaniuk
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum is largely conserved in its circuitry, but varies greatly in size and shape across species. The extent to which differences in cerebellar morphology is driven by changes in neuron numbers, neuron sizes or both, remains largely unknown. To determine how species variation in cerebellum size and shape is reflective of neuron sizes and numbers requires the development of a suitable comparative data set and one that can effectively separate different neuronal populations. Here, we generated the largest comparative dataset to date on neuron numbers, sizes, and volumes of cortical layers and surface area of the cerebellum across 54 bird species. Across different cerebellar sizes, the cortical layers maintained relatively constant proportions to one another and variation in cerebellum size was largely due to neuron numbers rather than neuron sizes. However, the rate at which neuron numbers increased with cerebellum size varied across Purkinje cells, granule cells, and cerebellar nuclei neurons. We also examined the relationship among neuron numbers, cerebellar surface area and cerebellar folding. Our estimate of cerebellar folding, the midsagittal foliation index, was a poor predictor of surface area and number of Purkinje cells, but surface area was the best predictor of Purkinje cell numbers. Overall, this represents the first comprehensive, quantitative analysis of cerebellar anatomy in a comparative context of any vertebrate. The extent to which these relationships occur in other vertebrates requires a similar approach and would determine whether the same scaling principles apply throughout the evolution of the cerebellum.

Indexed as

CerebellumPurkinje CellsAnimalsBirdsCerebellar NucleiNeuronsBrain allometryBrain evolutionCerebellumNeuroanatomy

Identifiers

PMID34357439
OpenAlexW3190548234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.