Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34357417›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Computer-assisted photoreceptor assessment on Heidelberg Engineering Spectralis™ High Magnification Module™ images.

Timo W F Mulders, B Jeroen Klevering, Carel B Hoyng, Thomas Theelen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timo W F MuldersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
B Jeroen KleveringDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas TheelenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Philips van Leydenlaan 15, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Thomas.Theelen@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-1171
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate reliability and repeatability of computer-assisted measurements of cone photoreceptor metrics on Heidelberg Engineering Spectralis™ High Magnification Module (HMM™) Automatic Real-time Tracking (ART™) images.

methodsWe analyzed HMM™ images in three separate study arms. Computer-assisted cone identification software was validated using an open-access adaptive optics (AO) dataset. We compared results of the first arm to data from AO and histology. We evaluated intersession repeatability of our computer-assisted cone analysis in the second arm. We assessed the capability of HMM™ to visualize cones in the presence of pathology in the third arm.

resultsWe included 10 healthy subjects in the first arm of our study, 5 additional healthy participants in the second arm and 5 patients in the third arm. In total, we analyzed 225 regions of interest on HMM™ images. We were able to automatically identify cone photoreceptors and assess corresponding metrics at all eccentricities between 2 and 9° from the fovea. Cone density significantly declined with increasing eccentricity (p = 4.890E-26, Friedman test). With increasing eccentricity, we found a significant increase in intercell distance (p = 2.196E-25, Friedman test) and nearest neighbor distance (p = 1.997E-25, Friedman test). Cone hexagonality ranged between 71 and 85%. We found excellent automated intersession repeatability of cone density counts and spacing measurements. In pathology, we were also able to repeatedly visualize photoreceptors.

conclusionComputer-assisted cone photoreceptor analysis on Spectralis™ HMM™ images is feasible, and most cone metrics show excellent repeatability. HMM™ imaging may be useful for photoreceptor analysis as progression marker in outer retinal disease.

Indexed as

Fovea CentralisRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsCell CountComputersHumansOphthalmoscopyOptics and PhotonicsReproducibility of ResultsComputer-assisted photoreceptor analysisCone metricsHigh Magnification Module™Repeatability

Identifiers

PMID34357417
PMCPMC8523433
OpenAlexW3191759125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.