Trial reportJAMA network open2021
Effect of Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide on Development of Migraine Headaches: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of a Long-lasting Infusion of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) on Headache, Cranial Hemodynamic and Autonomic Symptoms in Episodic Migraine Patients Without Aura
Immune System, Inflammation, Migraine - The Role of Cytokines and Regulatory T Lymphocytes in Migraine Pathophysiology
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of migraine in patients with allergic rhinitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Sildenafil provokes headache but not migraine in men with migraine without aura: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- The effect of Lu AG09222 on PACAP38- and VIP-induced vasodilation, heart rate increase, and headache in healthy subjects: an interventional, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Trial
- Bridging the gap: molecular mechanisms, regional activity and connectivity in headache disorders.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness versus vestibular migraine: A narrative review.Headache · 2026Review
- Emerging pharmacological targets in migraine therapy: CGRP and beyond.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Neurotransmitter Imbalance in Cluster Headache: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- The vessel-to-neuron trigeminovascular hypothesis of migraine pathogenesis - the 'pro' argument.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- The role and interaction of hypothalamic-related neurotransmitters in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Unmasking the relationship between CGRP and glutamate: from peripheral excitation to central sensitization in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Targeting PACAP: Beyond Migraine to Cluster, Menstrual, and Post-traumatic Headaches.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide signalling as a therapeutic target in migraine.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Meningeal brain borders and migraine headache genesis.Trends in neurosciences · 2024Review
- Intranasal administration of recombinant human BDNF as a potential therapy for some primary headaches.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors mediate tactile hindpaw hypersensitivity and carotid artery dilatation induced by PACAP38 in a migraine relevant mouse model.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Pituitary cyclase-activating polypeptide targeted treatments for the treatment of primary headache disorders.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Review
- Provocation of attacks to discover migraine signaling mechanisms and new drug targets: early history and future perspectives - a narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- From CGRP to PACAP, VIP, and Beyond: Unraveling the Next Chapters in Migraine Treatment.Cells · 2023Review
- Calcitonin/PACTrends in pharmacological sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides (PACAPs) are structurally and functionally related, yet different in their migraine-inducing properties. It remains unclear whether the lack of migraine induction can be attributed to the only transient vasodilatory response after a 20-minute infusion of VIP. Objective: To determine whether a 2-hour infusion of VIP would provoke migraine attacks. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted between May and September 2020 at the Danish Headache Center in Copenhagen, Denmark. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were ages 18 to 40 years, weighed between 50 and 90 kg, had a diagnosis of migraine without aura as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders, and had a migraine frequency of 1 to 6 attacks per month. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to receive a 2-hour infusion of VIP or placebo on 2 different days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the difference in incidence of experimentally induced migraine attacks during the observational period (0-12 hours) between VIP and placebo. Results: Twenty-one patients (17 [81%] women and 4 [19%] men; mean [range] age, 25.9 [19-40] years) were recruited in the study. Fifteen patients (71%; 95% CI, 48%-89%) developed migraine attacks after VIP compared with 1 patient (5%; 95% CI, 0%-24%) who developed a migraine attack after placebo (P < .001). The VIP-induced migraine attacks mimicked patients' spontaneous attacks. The area under the curve (AUC) of headache intensity scores (0-12 hours), as well as the AUC of the superficial temporal artery diameter (0-180 minute) were significantly greater after VIP compared with placebo (AUC0-12h, P = .003; AUC0-180min, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: A 2-hour infusion of VIP caused migraine attacks, suggesting an important role of VIP in migraine pathophysiology. VIP and its receptors could be potential targets for novel migraine drugs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260035.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.