ReviewMicromachines2021
Challenges and Perspectives for Biosensing of Bioaerosol Containing Pathogenic Microorganisms.
Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Centrifugal microfluidics for rapid target analyte quantification in airborne bioaerosols.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Adaptation of the multiplexed CRISPR-Cas13 CARMEN RVP assay for longitudinal detection of respiratory pathogens from air samples.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Microfluidics for the biological analysis of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles: Perspectives and challenges.Biomicrofluidics · 2025Review
- Diversity and Composition of the Airborne Fungal Community in Mexico City with a Metagenomic Approach.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Development of a Novel Electrostatic-Based Bioaerosol Sampler.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Review
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Are Virulent Viruses-Are We Prepared? An Overview.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Attaching protein-adsorbing silica particles to the surface of cotton substrates for bioaerosol capture including SARS-CoV-2.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Paper-based sensors for bacteria detection.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Review
- On-site bioaerosol sampling and detection in microfluidic platforms.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Review
- Performance Evaluation and Validation of Air Samplers To Detect Aerosolized Coxiella burnetii.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an important route for disease transmission, bioaerosols have received increasing attention. In the past decades, many efforts were made to facilitate the development of bioaerosol monitoring; however, there are still some important challenges in bioaerosol collection and detection. Thus, recent advances in bioaerosol collection (such as sedimentation, filtration, centrifugation, impaction, impingement, and microfluidics) and detection methods (such as culture, molecular biological assay, and immunological assay) were summarized in this review. Besides, the important challenges and perspectives for bioaerosol biosensing were also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.