ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Strategies to Integrate Genomic Medicine into Clinical Care: Evidence from the IGNITE Network.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Genetic Counseling in Cardiology Clinics: From Guidelines to Practice.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Implementing Genomic Medicine in a Federally Qualified Health Center: Assessing Readiness through a Mixed-Methods Approach.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Proactive process evaluation of precision medicine platforms: a roadmap.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Utilization of genomic services among physicians in Kenya.PloS one · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Integration of Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenetic (PGx) Testing in Primary Care: Prioritizing Underserved Patients' Preferences in Implementation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Establishing an infrastructure to optimize the integration of genomics into research: Results from a precision health needs assessment.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Using implementation science to evaluate a population-wide genomic screening program: Findings from the first 20,000 In Our DNA SC participants.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Advancing Precision Medicine: A Review of Innovative In Silico Approaches for Drug Development, Clinical Pharmacology and Personalized Healthcare.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Development of an Electronic Health Record-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool for Patients With Lynch Syndrome.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Determinants of targeted cancer therapy use in community oncology practice: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Rummler-Brache process mapping.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Designing Software for Genomics Medicine Service Leaders to Engage Stakeholders.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023Article
- Precision Medicine in Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2023Review
- Patients' Perspectives of Factors That Influence Pharmacogenetic Testing Uptake: Enhancing Patient Counseling and Results Dissemination.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Developing CIRdb as a catalog of natural genetic variation in the Canary Islanders.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Experiences with Pharmacogenomic Testing among Patients and the General Public: Implications for Patient Counseling.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- A RE-AIM Framework Analysis of DNA-Based Population Screening: Using Implementation Science to Translate Research Into Practice in a Healthcare System.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Realities of Pharmacogenomic and Minimizing Misconceptions and Medication Misadventures.Delaware journal of public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complexity of genomic medicine can be streamlined by implementing some form of clinical decision support (CDS) to guide clinicians in how to use and interpret personalized data; however, it is not yet clear which strategies are best suited for this purpose. In this study, we used implementation science to identify common strategies for applying provider-based CDS interventions across six genomic medicine clinical research projects funded by an NIH consortium. Each project's strategies were elicited via a structured survey derived from a typology of implementation strategies, the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC), and follow-up interviews guided by both implementation strategy reporting criteria and a planning framework, RE-AIM, to obtain more detail about implementation strategies and desired outcomes. We found that, on average, the three pharmacogenomics implementation projects used more strategies than the disease-focused projects. Overall, projects had four implementation strategies in common; however, operationalization of each differed in accordance with each study's implementation outcomes. These four common strategies may be important for precision medicine program implementation, and pharmacogenomics may require more integration into clinical care. Understanding how and why these strategies were successfully employed could be useful for others implementing genomic or precision medicine programs in different contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.