Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356853›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Mild Stimulation Intensity Exerts Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Effects in Parkinson's Disease Model Rats.

Ittetsu Kin, Tatsuya Sasaki, Takao Yasuhara, Masahiro Kameda, Takashi Agari, Mihoko Okazaki, Kakeru Hosomoto, Yosuke Okazaki, Satoru Yabuno, Satoshi Kawauchi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Movement Disorders, from Principles to a Systematic Review of Evidence.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ittetsu KinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Tatsuya SasakiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Takao YasuharaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-9161-5283
Masahiro KamedaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Takashi AgariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, Tokyo 183-0042, Japan.
Mihoko OkazakiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Kakeru HosomotoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Yosuke OkazakiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Satoru YabunoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Satoshi KawauchiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Ken KuwaharaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Jun MorimotoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Kyohei KinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-5445-5647
Michiari UmakoshiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Yousuke TomitaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Naoki TajiriDepartment of Neurophysiology and Brain Science and Medical School, Graduate School of Medical Sciences and Medical School, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 464-0083, Japan.
Cesario V BorlonganDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-9782
Isao DateDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Okayama University · JPNagoya City University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital · JPUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan 09156274 and 24592129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe major surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) is deep brain stimulation (DBS), but a less invasive treatment is desired. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a relatively safe treatment without cerebral invasiveness. In this study, we developed a wireless controllable electrical stimulator to examine the efficacy of VNS on PD model rats.

methodsAdult female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent placement of a cuff-type electrode and stimulator on the vagus nerve. Following which, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) was administered into the left striatum to prepare a PD model. VNS was started immediately after 6-OHDA administration and continued for 14 days. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of VNS with behavioral and immunohistochemical outcome assays under different stimulation intensity (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mA).

resultsVNS with 0.25-0.5 mA intensity remarkably improved behavioral impairment, preserved dopamine neurons, reduced inflammatory glial cells, and increased noradrenergic neurons. On the other hand, VNS with 0.1 mA and 1 mA intensity did not display significant therapeutic efficacy.

conclusionsVNS with 0.25-0.5 mA intensity has anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects on PD model rats induced by 6-OHDA administration. In addition, we were able to confirm the practicality and effectiveness of the new experimental device.

Indexed as

anti-inflammationless invasive therapynew experimental deviceParkinson’s diseasevagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34356853
PMCPMC8301489
OpenAlexW3182338392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.