Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356788›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Evaluating the Implementation of a Pilot Quality Improvement Program to Support Appropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in General Practice.

Ruby Biezen, Kirsty Buising, Tim Monaghan, Rachael Ball, Karin Thursky, Ron Cheah, Malcolm Clark, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Implementing antibiotic stewardship in high-prescribing English general practices: a mixed-methods study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruby BiezenDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Kirsty BuisingNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Tim MonaghanDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Rachael BallNorth Western Melbourne Primary Health Network, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Karin ThurskyNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Ron CheahNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Malcolm ClarkDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Jo-Anne Manski-NankervisDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2153-3482
The University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUWestern Health · AU

Funding

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners TGL02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program in the form of quality improvement activities that included audit and feedback, clinical decision support and education was developed to help optimise prescribing in general practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of this program (Guidance GP) in three general practices in Melbourne, Australia, between November 2019 and August 2020. Thirty-one general practitioners (GPs) participated in the program, with 11 GPs and three practice managers participating in follow-up focus groups and interviews to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the program. Our findings showed that the quality improvement activities were acceptable to GPs, if they accurately fit GPs' decision-making process and workflow. It was also important that they provided clinically meaningful information in the form of audit and feedback to GPs. The time needed to coordinate the program, and costs to implement the program were some of the potential barriers identified. Facilitators of success were a "whole of practice" approach with enthusiastic GPs and practice staff, and an identified practice champion. The findings of this research will inform implementation strategies for both the Guidance GP program and AMS programs more broadly in Australian general practice, which will be critical for general practice participation and engagement.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial stewardshipaudit and feedbackgeneral practicegeneral practitionerinappropriate prescribingpractice managerprescribingprimary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34356788
PMCPMC8300821
OpenAlexW3183276982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.