Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356786›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Antimicrobial Activity of Calcium Silicate-Based Dental Materials: A Literature Review.

Ana Cristina Padilha Janini, Gabriela Fernanda Bombarda, Lauter Eston Pelepenko, Marina Angélica Marciano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biomaterials in Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  5. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Defect modification of calcium silicate and its application in oral bacteriostasis and tooth remineralization].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Cristina Padilha JaniniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3058-8557
Gabriela Fernanda BombardaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3506-6985
Lauter Eston PelepenkoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-8267
Marina Angélica MarcianoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6244-2531
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

FAPESP 2019/22098-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endodontic biomaterials have significantly improved dental treatment techniques in several aspects now that they can be used for vital pulp treatments, as temporary intracanal medication, in definitive fillings, in apical surgeries, and for regenerative procedures. Calcium silicate-based cement is a class of dental material that is used in endodontics in direct contact with the dental structures, connective tissue, and bone. Because the material interacts with biological tissues and stimulates biomineralization processes, its properties are of major importance. The main challenge in endodontic treatments is the elimination of biofilms that are present in the root canal system anatomical complexities, as it remains even after chemical-mechanical preparation and disinfection procedures. Thus, an additional challenge for these biomaterials is to exert antimicrobial activity while maintaining their biological properties in parallel. This article reviews the literature for studies considering the antimicrobial properties of calcium silicate-based dental biomaterials used in endodontic practice. Considering the reviewed studies, it can be affirmed that the reduced antimicrobial effect exhibited by calcium silicate-based endodontic materials clearly emphasizes that all clinical procedures prior to their use must be carefully performed. Future studies for the evaluation of these materials, and especially newly proposed materials, under poly-microbial biofilms associated with endodontic diseases will be necessary.

Indexed as

antimicrobial biofilmbioactive materialsendodonticsroot canal sealer

Identifiers

PMID34356786
PMCPMC8300656
OpenAlexW3178365442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.