ReviewBiosensors2021
Substrate Materials for Biomolecular Immobilization within Electrochemical Biosensors.
Review in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical Biosensors for Circulating Tumor Cells and ctDNA: Emerging Strategies for Precision Oncology.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Article
- Engineering Pt Single-Atom Doped SeSSmall methods · 2025Article
- Review on Research Progress of Photoelectrochemical Biosensors.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Article
- Recent Advances in Amperometric Biosensors for Medical Applications: A Mini-Review.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- An aptasensor with colorimetric and electrochemical dual-outputs for malathion detection utilizing peroxidase-like activity of Fe-MOF.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Portable Miniaturized IoT-Enabled Point-of-Care Device for Electrochemical Sensing of Zopiclone in Cocktails.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in Electrochemical Enzyme-Based Biosensors for Food and Beverage Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Salivary biomarkers: novel noninvasive tools to diagnose chronic inflammation.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- Review of Bacterial Nanocellulose-Based Electrochemical Biosensors: Functionalization, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Development of Folate-Group Impedimetric Biosensor Based on Polypyrrole Nanotubes Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Review
- Hybrid Nanobioengineered Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bioactive Coatings on Titanium: A Review on Hydroxylation, Self-Assembled Monolayers (SAMs) and Surface Modification Strategies.Polymers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrochemical biosensors have potential applications for agriculture, food safety, environmental monitoring, sports medicine, biomedicine, and other fields. One of the primary challenges in this field is the immobilization of biomolecular probes atop a solid substrate material with adequate stability, storage lifetime, and reproducibility. This review summarizes the current state of the art for covalent bonding of biomolecules onto solid substrate materials. Early research focused on the use of Au electrodes, with immobilization of biomolecules through ω-functionalized Au-thiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), but stability is usually inadequate due to the weak Au-S bond strength. Other noble substrates such as C, Pt, and Si have also been studied. While their nobility has the advantage of ensuring biocompatibility, it also has the disadvantage of making them relatively unreactive towards covalent bond formation. With the exception of Sn-doped In
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.