Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356582›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

ArtiSential

Giovanni Parente, Eduje Thomas, Sara Cravano, Marco Di Mitri, Marzia Vastano, Tommaso Gargano, Tosca Cerasoli, Francesca Ruspi, Michele Libri, Mario Lima

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06050161 (Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Utilizing the Artisential Articulating Laparoscopic Instruments), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06050161 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Utilizing the Artisential Articulating Laparoscopic Instruments

TypeinterventionalSponsorKern Medical CenterRan2023 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Mesh Augmentation, Laparoscopic SurgeryArmsArticulating laparoscopic instrument, Conventional laparoscopic instrument, Robotic surgical instrument
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Early experience with the ARTISENTIALTechniques in coloproctology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giovanni ParentePediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7119-651X
Eduje ThomasPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Sara CravanoPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Marco Di MitriPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Marzia VastanoPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Tommaso GarganoPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Tosca CerasoliPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Francesca RuspiPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Michele LibriPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Mario LimaPediatric Surgery Department, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5877-440X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic surgery is currently a reality in surgical practice, and many endeavors have been made to extend its application also in pediatric surgery. In the absence of easy access to a robotic surgical system, new devices have been developed to offer a valid alternative such as wristed instruments. These differ from conventional laparoscopic instruments owing to a wrist-like mechanism at the tip, which faithfully reproduces the movements of the surgeon's hands, regaining more movement's degrees; Methods: We present two case reports in which the patients were subjected to minimally invasive procedures with aid of wristed instruments, followed by a review of the literature regarding the devices commonly marketed; Results: Articulated or wristed instruments render the same features seen in robotic surgery, such as major dexterity in smaller spaces, restitution of more natural movements and the ability to get over obstacles in a direct visual line. Our center recently equipped with ArtiSential

Indexed as

articulated instrumentslaparoscopyminimally invasive surgeryrobot-like instrumentssurgical dexteritythoracoscopywristwristed instruments

Identifiers

PMID34356582
PMCPMC8306555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.