ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Prediction Model for Diagnosis of Kawasaki Disease Using iTRAQ-Based Analysis.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of Machine Learning in Discriminating Kawasaki Disease and Other Febrile Illnesses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring the diagnostic value of CLR and CPR in differentiating Kawasaki disease from other infectious diseases based on clinical predictive modeling.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of Kawasaki disease in children from 2012 to 2022.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Advances in understanding Kawasaki disease-related immuno-inflammatory response and vascular endothelial dysfunction.Pediatric investigation · 2022Review
- Reappraisal of VEGF in the Pathogenesis of Kawasaki Disease.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A quick prediction method may help confirm the diagnosis of Kawasaki disease (KD), and reduce the risk of coronary artery lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential candidate diagnostic serum proteins in KD using isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) gel-free proteomics. Ninety two subjects, including 68 KD patients (1.6 ± 1.2 years, M/F 36/32) and 24 fever controls with evident respiratory tract infection (2.1 ± 1.2 years, M/F 13/11) were enrolled. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and laboratory data. The iTRAQ gel-free proteomics was used to screen serum proteins completely and compare the difference between two groups followed by specific validation with ELISA. The candidate proteins and conventional laboratory items were selected for the prediction model of KD diagnosis by support vector machine. Five selected candidate proteins, including protein S100-A8, protein S100-A9, protein S100-A12, neutrophil defensin 1, and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1 were identified for developing the prediction model of KD diagnosis. They were used to develop an efficient KD prediction model with an area under receiver operating characteristic (auROC) value of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.84, 0.98). These protein biomarkers were significantly correlated with the conventional laboratory items as follows: C-reactive protein, glutamic pyruvic transaminase, white blood count, platelet, segment and hemoglobin. These conventional laboratory items were used to develop a prediction model of KD diagnosis with an auROC value of 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.80, 0.96). Our result demonstrated that the prediction model with combined five selected candidate protein levels may be a good diagnostic tool of KD. Further prediction model with combined six conventional laboratory data is also an acceptable alternative method for KD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.