Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356540›Full record

ReviewBiology2021

Doubled Haploids in Eggplant.

Ricardo Mir, Antonio Calabuig-Serna, Jose M Seguí-Simarro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Calcium levels modulate embryo yield inFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Haploid Induction in Tomato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Mutations in theFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricardo MirCell Biology Group-COMAV Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46011 Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Calabuig-SernaCell Biology Group-COMAV Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46011 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7231-7766
Jose M Seguí-SimarroCell Biology Group-COMAV Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46011 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7672-4169

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana CDEIGENT 2018/023Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-115763RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eggplant is a solanaceous crop cultivated worldwide for its edible fruit. Eggplant breeding programs are mainly aimed to the generation of F1 hybrids by crossing two highly homozygous, pure lines, which are traditionally obtained upon several self crossing generations, which is an expensive and time consuming process. Alternatively, fully homozygous, doubled haploid (DH) individuals can be induced from haploid cells of the germ line in a single generation. Several attempts have been made to develop protocols to produce eggplant DHs principally using anther culture and isolated microspore culture. Eggplant could be considered a moderately recalcitrant species in terms of ability for DH production. Anther culture stands nowadays as the most valuable technology to obtain eggplant DHs. However, the theoretical possibility of having plants regenerated from somatic tissues of the anther walls cannot be ruled out. For this reason, the use of isolated microspores is recommended when possible. This approach still has room for improvement, but it is largely genotype-dependent. In this review, we compile the most relevant advances made in DH production in eggplant, their application to breeding programs, and the future perspectives for the development of other, less genotype-dependent, DH technologies.

Indexed as

androgenesisanther cultureauberginehaploidymicrospore cultureSolanum melongena

Identifiers

PMID34356540
PMCPMC8301345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.