Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356090›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Discovery and Genetic Differentiation Analysis of Geese Bred in Poland, Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS).

Joanna Grzegorczyk, Artur Gurgul, Maria Oczkowicz, Tomasz Szmatoła, Agnieszka Fornal, Monika Bugno-Poniewierska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Population Genomics of the Critically Endangered Brazilian Merganser.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna GrzegorczykDepartment of Molecular Biology of Animals, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice n., 32-083 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0773-4723
Artur GurgulCenter for Experimental and Innovative Medicine, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 24-28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5979-144X
Maria OczkowiczDepartment of Molecular Biology of Animals, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice n., 32-083 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8975-0200
Tomasz SzmatołaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Animals, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice n., 32-083 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1588-4198
Agnieszka FornalDepartment of Molecular Biology of Animals, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice n., 32-083 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-0265
Monika Bugno-PoniewierskaDepartment of Animal Reproduction, Faculty Anatomy and Genomics of Animal Breeding and Biology, Agricultural University in Cracow, Al. Mickiewicza 24-28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-6641
National Research Institute of Animal Production · PLUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poland is the largest European producer of goose, while goose breeding has become an essential and still increasing branch of the poultry industry. The most frequently bred goose is the White Kołuda

Indexed as

AllelesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBiomarkersBreedingGeeseGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesPolandPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence AnalysisBiomarkersAnserconservative flocksgenotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)gooseSNP discoveryWhite Kołuda® goose

Identifiers

PMID34356090
PMCPMC8307914
OpenAlexW3182178134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.