Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34356066›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

Differences in Ovarian and Other Cancers Risks by Population and

Masayuki Sekine, Koji Nishino, Takayuki Enomoto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Effects ofCells · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Identification and Computational Analysis ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Differences in age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer for eachJournal of gynecologic oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masayuki SekineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0751-6395
Koji NishinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
Niigata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is caused by a germline mutation in

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinEthnicityFemaleHumansNeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1/2BRCA-related cancerhereditary breast and ovarian cancerrisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID34356066
PMCPMC8303997
OpenAlexW3179036350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.