Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355754›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2021

Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of school-based health promotion programmes for chronic disease prevention.

John P Ekwaru, Arto Ohinmaa, Julia Dabravolskaj, Katerina Maximova, Paul J Veugelers

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. School- and intervention-related factors associated with institutionalization of health promotion interventions in elementary schools.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. From best practice to next practice: implementing Comprehensive School Health in rural and remote northern communities.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Health educationFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John P EkwaruSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Arto OhinmaaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Julia DabravolskajSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Katerina MaximovaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Paul J VeugelersSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8996-0822

Funding

Alberta Innovates Collaborative Research and Innovative Opportunities Team 201300671Alberta Innovates Collaborative Research and Innovative Opportunities Team grant to P.J.V. and A.O. 201300671K.M. holds a Murphy Family Foundation Chair in Early Life InterventionsMurphy Family Foundation Chair in Early Life Interventions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile school-based health prevention programmes are effective in addressing unhealthy diet and physical inactivity, little is known about their economic implications. We conducted an economic evaluation of the programmes that were previously identified as feasible, acceptable, and sustainable in the Canadian context.

methodsThis study builds on a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of feasible, acceptable, and sustainable school-based health promotion programmes. A micro-simulation model incorporated intervention effects on multiple risk factors to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) of comprehensive school health (CSH), multicomponent, and physical education (PE) curriculum modification programmes. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the programme costs below which the programme would be cost-effective at a CA$50 000 threshold level.

resultsThe estimated costs below which interventions were cost-effective per quality-adjusted life year gained were CA$682, CA$444, and CA$416 per student for CSH, multicomponent, and PE curriculum modification programmes, respectively. CSH programmes remained cost-effective per year of chronic disease prevented for costs of up to CA$3384 per student, compared to CA$1911 and CA$1987 for multicomponent and PE curriculum modification interventions, respectively. If the interventions were implemented at total discounted intervention costs of CA$100 per student, ROI through the avoidance of direct healthcare costs related to the treatment and management of chronic diseases would be 824% for CSH, 465% for multicomponent interventions, and 484% for PE curriculum modification interventions.

conclusionsWhereas each examined intervention types showed favourable economic benefits, CSH programmes appeared to be the most cost-effective and to have the highest ROI.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSchoolsCanadaChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID34355754
PMCPMC8643402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.