Trial reportESC heart failure2021
Effect of a strategy of comprehensive vasodilation versus usual care on health-related quality of life among patients with acute heart failure.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Thoracentesis in Acute Heart Failure.Circulation · 2025Trial
- Individual Trajectories of Health Status During the First Year of Discharge From Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Their Associations With Death in the Following Years.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- Effects of Empagliflozin on Symptoms, Physical Limitations, and Quality of Life in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure: Results From the EMPULSE Trial.Circulation · 2022Trial
- Effect of a strategy of comprehensive vasodilation versus usual care on health-related quality of life among patients with acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2021Trial
- Prognostic Value of Self-Reported Subjective Exercise Capacity in Patients With Acute Dyspnea.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe aimed to assess the long-term effect of a strategy of comprehensive vasodilation versus usual care on health-related quality of life (HRQL) among patients with acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND
resultsHealth-related quality of life was prospectively assessed by the generic 3-levelled EQ-5D and the disease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) among adult AHF patients enrolled in an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label blinded-end-point trial of a strategy that emphasized early intensive and sustained vasodilation using maximally tolerated doses of established oral and transdermal vasodilators according to systolic blood pressure. Changes in EQ-5D and KCCQ from admission to 180 day follow-up were individually compared between the intensive vasodilatation and the usual care group. Among 666 patients eligible for 180 day follow-up, 284 (43%, median age 79 years, 35% women) and 198 (30%, median age 77 years, 35% women) had completed the EQ-5D and KCCQ at baseline and follow-up, respectively. There was a significant improvement in HRQL as quantified by both, EQ-5D and KCCQ, from hospitalization to 180 day follow-up, with no significant differences in the change of HRQL between both treatment strategies. For instance, 39 (26%) versus 33 (25%) patients had an improvement by at least one level in at least two categories in the EQ-5D. Median increase in KCCQ overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) was 17.6 (IQR 2.0-42.6) in the intervention group versus 18.5 (IQR 3.9-39.3) in the usual care group (P < 0.001 vs. baseline, P = 0.945 between groups).
conclusionsAmong patients with AHF, long-term HRQL quantified by EQ-5D and KCCQ improved substantially, with overall no significant differences between a strategy of comprehensive vasodilation versus usual care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.