Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355460›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Lesions: Reclassification of a Glioblastoma as an Endometrial Cancer Metastasis to the Brain.

Shuk On Annie Leung, Olivia Foley, David Chapel, Annacarolina Da Silva, Marisa Nucci, Michael G Muto, Susana Campos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuk On Annie LeungDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-7595
Olivia FoleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David ChapelDepartment of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Annacarolina Da SilvaWomen's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marisa NucciWomen's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael G MutoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Susana CamposDepartment of Medical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S., but metastasis to the brain is rare, and diagnosis can be challenging. Traditional tools for determining if a tumor is a primary or metastatic lesion include pan-imaging, histopathologic studies, and immunohistochemistry. Molecular testing with next-generation sequencing has been increasingly used to augment these tests. We present a case of a patient who initially presented with a brain lesion diagnosed as glioblastoma on histology and immunohistochemistry, but whose diagnosis was later changed to metastasis from an endometrial primary based on molecular findings. The two tumors shared a common microsatellite instability signature and 51 DNA variants, including oncogenic driver mutations KRAS p.G13D, PIK3CA p.E545A, and PTEN p.I135V and p.K267Rfs*9. This highlights the power of molecular analysis in making the diagnosis in cases of rare metastases. KEY POINTS: Brain metastasis from endometrial primary is rare, and histopathological features may be augmented with molecular analysis to aid in diagnosis. Comparison of the molecular makeup of the primary endometrial lesion with the metastatic lesion may reveal high-risk molecular features that may be indicative of metastatic potential.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBrainFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansBrain metastasesEndometrial cancerKRASPIK3CAPTEN

Identifiers

PMID34355460
PMCPMC8649002
OpenAlexW3187302100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.