Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355449›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2022

Integrated genotype-phenotype analysis of long-term epilepsy-associated ganglioglioma.

Yujiao Wang, Leiming Wang, Ingmar Blümcke, Weiwei Zhang, Yongjuan Fu, Yongzhi Shan, Yueshan Piao, Guoguang Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular features in gangliogliomas: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Spatial transcriptomics in focal cortical dysplasia type IIb.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yujiao WangDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Leiming WangDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8257-0175
Ingmar BlümckeDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8676-0788
Weiwei ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongjuan FuDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongzhi ShanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yueshan PiaoDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6081-1129
Guoguang ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BRAF p.V600E mutation is the most common genetic alteration in ganglioglioma (GG). Herein, we collected a consecutive series of 30 GG specimens from Xuanwu Hospital in order to corroborate the genetic landscape and genotype-phenotype correlation of this enigmatic and often difficult-to-classify epilepsy-associated brain tumor entity. All specimens with histopathologically confirmed lesions were submitted to targeted next-generation sequencing using a panel of 131 genes. Genetic alterations in three cases with histologically distinct tumor components, that is, GG plus pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA), dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), or an oligodendroglioma (ODG)-like tumor component, were separately studied. A mean post-surgical follow-up time-period of 23 months was available in 24 patients. Seventy seven percent of GG in our series can be explained by genetic alterations, with BRAF p.V600E mutations being most prevalent (n = 20). Three additional cases showed KRAS p.Q22R and KRAS p.G13R, IRS2 copy number gain (CNG) and a KIAA1549-BRAF fusion. When genetically studying different histopathology patterns from the same tumor we identified composite features with BRAF p.V600E plus CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion in a GG with PXA features, IRS2 CNG in a GG with DNT features, and a BRAF p.V600E plus CNG of chromosome 7 in a GG with ODG-like features. Follow-up revealed no malignant tumor progression but nine patients had seizure recurrence. Eight of these nine GG were immunoreactive for CD34, six patients were male, five were BRAF wildtype, and atypical histopathology features were encountered in four patients, that is, ki-67 proliferation index above 5% or with PXA component. Our results strongly point to activation of the MAP kinase pathway in the vast majority of GG and their molecular-genetic differentiation from the cohort of low-grade pediatric type diffuse glioma remains, however, to be further clarified. In addition, histopathologically distinct tumor components accumulated different genetic alterations suggesting collision or composite glio-neuronal GG variants.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsEpilepsyGangliogliomaChildHomozygoteHumansMaleMutationPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSequence DeletionProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF p.V600Edysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumorepilepsygangliogliomaMAP kinase signaling pathwaypleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma

Identifiers

PMID34355449
PMCPMC8713530
OpenAlexW3193179858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.